Organica for Improved Land Value

To improve neighborhood relations, a utility is looking to upgrade the facility to eliminate odor, reduce noise, and improve the site visually.

In addition, it is a good opportunity to enhance effluent quality and minimize operational expenditures.

Organica wastewater treatment plant


Due to today’s “urban sprawl”, many wastewater treatment facilities have transformed from distant buildings into today’s close neighbors.  As a result, utility responsibilities have expanded beyond wastewater management; they now also have to be “good neighbors” and a positive member of the community.

An example of this dynamic takes place with a 75 MLD facility in China built in 1987 currently utilizing a conventional activated sludge process.  Over the years, population growth has resulted in the city building closer and closer, placing the treatment facility in the middle of a residential area.  With homes in close proximity to the facility, the utility receives consistent complaints from neighbors over the facility’s poor aesthetics, foul odors, and excessive noise, in combination referred to as “psychological footprint”.



land value chartIn China, a common solution is the conventional AAO (Anaerobic-Anoxic-Oxic) process.  However, odor control with AAO is challenging and costly, and yet the solution is still visually unattractive.  In addition, this option has significant capital and operational costs.  As a result, the utility chose to search for alternative upgrade solutions that could satisfy the wider project needs.

In contrast to the AAO alternative, the Organica solution completely solves odour and aesthetic issues. This solution also enables the utility to cost-effectively upgrade the facility, providing CAPEX savings of US$3.4M over conventional options.  Further enhancing the facility’s sustainability credentials, Organica solutions require significantly less energy and allow the utility to reduce operational costs by US$350,000 annually.

Additionally, the eliminated “psychological footprint” enables construction of high-value office spaces on the existing property, generating considerable revenue for the utility.


In contrast to the proposed AAO solution, the Organica solution offers numerous advantages:

  • Odorless and aesthetically-pleasing
  • Opportunity for on-site development
  • Savings on capital and operational expenditures



Odorless and Aesthetically Pleasing

South PestThe Organica solution is housed in an odorless, aesthetically-pleasing enclosure, providing a unique botanical garden-like look and feel.  With these features, the upgrade eliminates the pre-existing negative impacts on the surrounding environment, largely improving community relations and overall property values surrounding the site.

On-Site Development Generates Additional Revenue

By eliminating the “psychological footprint” and liberating scarce land resources, additional property development is possible on the existing site.  Organica’s architectural design creates 11,000 m2 (120,000 ft2) of new office space and 2,000 m2 (22,000 ft2) of public area above the pre-treatment and sludge de watering buildings.  In the dense urban area, this development will generate substantial profits for the utility group.

Lower capital expenditures and operational costs

Upgrading the facility with the Organica solution provided clear financial advantages over conventional process, reducing the upfront capital investment by 15% (savings of US$3.4 million).  Further, the Organica solution reduces energy consumption by 38%, resulting in 10% lower total operational costs (saving US$350,000 annually).  Due to these savings, utilizing the Organica solution will decrease the Net Present Value (NPV) of the investment by US$7 million to US$51 million.

 Tianshan central

click to enlarge

Assumptions: OPEX for both Organica and the alternative wastewater treatment option are assumed to increase at an annual rate of 3%. NPV is calculated over a 20-year time frame using a 10% discount rate.

Disclaimer: Financial estimates used are based on a proposal for a retrofit project in China. Images are sample displays. This case study is created for informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a quote or offer of any kind. Financial data, OPEX, CAPEX, actual footprint, components (including but not limited to water reuse functionality), etc. may vary per project depending on the actual requirements.

Download this case study


Create your custom design

Use our WWTP Design Generator to plan and compare multiple wastewater treatment plant options in 3 easy steps

Use our smart form to swiftly enter your data
Lean back and let the engine crunch the numbers, run the design algorithms and create your design
Receive your WWTP designs in a matter of hours

Start Now